LAW.coLAW.co

Edward H. Barnett, complainant, v. Schickerling Products Corporation, defendant

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1933-09-27
114 N.J. Eq. 43

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes, and reported in 112 N. J. Eq. 1. For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Van Bus-kirk, Kays, Hetfteld, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 14. For reversal — None.