LAW.coLAW.co

Hazel Howe Rushmore, complainant-appellant, v. Samuel Willis Rushmore, defendant-respondent

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1933-09-27
114 N.J. Eq. 151

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Advisory Master Heed in the court of chancery. For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Teenchaed, Case, Bodine, Donces, Hehee, Peeskie, Van Buskiek, Kays, Deae, Wells, Dill, JJ. 12. For reversal — None.