WALTON SHERMAN ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. CITY OF LONG BRANCH, RESPONDENT

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for -the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Trenchard, Lloyd, Case, Daly, Donges, Van Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Kerney JJ. 12. For reversal — None.