LAW.coLAW.co

Durham, executrix, v. Armstrong; et vice versa

Supreme Court of Georgia1935-07-10No. Nos. 10610, 10614
181 Ga. 137

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Beck, Presiding Justice.

Under tlie evidence tlie jury were not authorized to return any verdict other than that directed by the court. The evidence as a whole required this verdict: Judgment affirmed on main bill of exceptions; cross-bill dismissed.

All the Justices concur, except Gilbert, J., absent.

Tye, Thomson & Tye, for plaintiff in error.

W. 8. Northcuti and James B. Childs, contra.