FRANK M. SPRAGUE, RESPONDENT, v. JOSEPH A. PENROSE ET AL., APPELLANTS

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion filed in the Supreme Court. For affirmance — Tbenchabd, Lloyd, Case, Donges, Bbogan, Van Busiciek, Kays, Deab, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 10. For reversal — None.