HYMAN HORDES, RESPONDENT, v. J. I. KISLAK, INCORPORATED, APPELLANT

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the per curiam opinion of the Supreme Court, ubi supra. For affirmance — Teenchard, Case, Donges, Beogan, Kays, Wells, JJ. 6.

For reversal — Parker, Yan Buskiek, Keeney, JJ. 3.