Per Curiam.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court whose opinion is reported at 9 N. J. Mis. R. 43. In that opinion it is inadvertently stated that the judgment was based upon a nonsuit ordered by the trial judge, whereas in fact it was based upon a directed verdict. With this correction the judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the court below. For .affirmance — The Chief Justice, Trenchard, Lloyd, Case, Donges, Van Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Kerney, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.