LAW.coLAW.co

Dorothea Nagle, respondent, v. Harry Conard et al., appellants

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1912-06-20
80 N.J. Eq. 253

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Yice-Chancellor Howell. For affirmance—The Ci-iiee-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Voorhees, Minturn, Kalisoh, Bogert, Ykedenburgei, Vroom, Congdon, White, Treacy—15. For reversal—Hone.