LAW.coLAW.co

Wladyskaw Szpak, complainant-respondent, v. Kazimiera Szpak, defendant-appellant

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1933-09-27
114 N.J. Eq. 143

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered by Advisory Master Minturn in the court of chancery. • For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Teenchaed, Paekee, Case, Bodine, Donces, Hehee, Peeskie, Van Buskiek, Kays, Hetfield, Deae, Wells, Dill, JJ. 14. For reversal — None.