LAW.coLAW.co

JAMES THOMAS, RESPONDENT, v. LIONDALE BLEACH, DYE AND PRINT WORKS, APPELLANT

New Jersey Supreme Court1933-01-23
110 N.J.L. 27

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Pee Cueiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court, and printed in 10 N. J. Mis. R. 255. For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Pabicee, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Beogan, Hehee, Kays, Hetfield, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.