LAW.coLAW.co

GEORGE PALM CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, PROSECUTOR-APPELLANT, v. EDWARD BAHR, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT

New Jersey Supreme Court1933-04-27
110 N.J.L. 455

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Pee Cueiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court. See, also, Thomas v. Liondale Bleach, Dye and Print Works, 10 N. J. Mis. R. 255. For affirmance — The Chahcellob, Chiee Justice, Paeicee, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Hehee, Yah Buskiek, Kays, Heteield, Deae, Wells, Dill, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.