Pee Cueiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court, and printed in 9 N. J. Mis. R. 246. For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Teenchaed, Lloyd, Case, Donges, Beogan, Van Buskiek, Kays, Hetfield, Deae, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 12. For reversal — None.