MARY E. MUNSON, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. H. Y. JOHNSON, J. A. NESBITT AND WILLIAM MILLER, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS

Pee Cdeiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Teen-chard, Parked, Lloyd, Case, Heiier, Yan Buskiek, Kays, Dear, Wells, JJ. 11. For reversal — None.