DOROTHY L. BERRY, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. SILENT AUTOMATIC SALES COMPANY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Case, Bodine, Donges, Perskie, Van Buskiitk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 13. For reversal — None.