LAW.coLAW.co

ROSEVILLE INVESTMENT CORPORATION, RESPONDENT, v. SOLOMON GRUDIN, APPELLANT

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1933-09-27
111 N.J.L. 396

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Pee Cueiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Judge Smith in the Circuit Court. For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Chiee Justice, Teenchaed, Paekee, Case, Bodine, Donges, ECehee, Peeskie, Van Buskiek, Kays, Heteield, Deae, Wells, Dill, JJ. 15. For reversal — None.