LAW.coLAW.co

ARTHUR ALLORD, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. THE HENRY MUHS COMPANY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1933-09-27
111 N.J.L. 237

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion filed in the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Case, Heher, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 13. For reversal — Hone.