LAW.coLAW.co

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. WILLIAM THOMAS, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1933-09-27
111 N.J.L. 239

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Pee Cueiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion in the Supreme Court, and printed in 11 N. J. Mis. R. 157. For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Chief Justice, Tbenchaed, Paekeb, Case, Heheb, Peeskie, Van Buskiek, Kays, Heteield, Deae, Wells, Dill, JJ. 13. For reversal — None.