LAW.coLAW.co

Rigoberto ANDRADE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED FRUIT COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit1963-01-25No. No. 228, Docket 27812
312 F.2d 889

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm in open court Judge Fein-berg’s denial of plaintiff’s motion, F.R. Civ.Proc. 60(b), to set aside a verdict for defendant in a seaman’s action, on the ground that a juror allegedly failed to disclose a fact relating to his employment which made him incapable of being a disinterested juror. There was no reason why the juror should have supposed his employment so disqualified him; if plaintiff’s trial counsel desired further information concerning this, it was for him to obtain it on the voir dire.