Per Curiam:
The principal error assigned in this appeal pertains to the order of the trial court in sustaining appellee’s motion for a new trial, where the court expressed its dissatisfaction with the verdict. In such a situation it was the trial court’s duty to grant a new trial, and the appeal from that ruling presents no substantial question for appellate review — following Klopfenstein v. Traction Co., 109 Kan. 351, 354-355, 198 Pac. 930.
The judgment is affirmed.