LAW.coLAW.co

JOSEPH PARETTI, RESPONDENT, v. FRANK M. MITCHELL, RECEIVER, ET AL., APPELLANTS

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1934-02-02
112 N.J.L. 384

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Pee Cubiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion in the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Heher, Perskie, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 13. For reversal — None.