LAW.coLAW.co

PAUL SEGLIE, APPELLANT, v. HENRY ACKERMAN ET AL., RESPONDENTS

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1917-10-12
91 N.J.L. 332

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Pee Curiam. .

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Kalisch in the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, JJ. 10. For reversal — None.