PER CURIAM.
The court has considered appellant’s position in light of oral argument, the briefs, and the record. Having done so, we find no reversible error. The evidence is sufficient to sustain appellant’s conviction, and the district court did not abuse its discretion in excluding appellant’s “reverse 404(b)” evidence or in allowing the govern ment to introduce appellant’s statements to the police.
AFFIRMED.
. Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, this Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.