LAW.coLAW.co

Larry NEWELL, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ron ANGELONE; Page True; L. Fleming; J.B. OQuinn, Sergeant; L. Hall; A. Kilbourne; V. Tate; James E. Briggs; Correctional Officer Sykes; Correctional Officer Lambert; Correctional Officer Sullivan; Sergeant Rose, Defendants-Appellees, and J. Armentrout; G. Hawks; Richard Young; Doctor Nwauche; Nurse Messer; Nurse Haynes; Nurse Mead; J. Hill, Nurse; P. Adams, Nurse; Nurse Brownley; Nurse Yates; Nurse Neeley; F. Schilling; L. Mullins; Brett Edmonds; W.E. Martin; John Doe, Defendants

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit2003-09-02No. No. 03-6390
75 F. App'x 129

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

PER CURIAM.

Larry Newell, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders denying relief in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action, pursuant to the jury’s verdict. Newell has not provided a transcript, and he fails to establish a basis to have a transcript prepared at government expense. 28 U.S.C. § 753(f) (2000). We have reviewed the existing record and find no basis for appellate relief. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. See Newell v. Angelone, No. CA-01-70241, 2002 WL 378438 (W.D.Va. Mar. 7, 2002). We deny Newell’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.