WEST SHORE RAILROAD COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE BOARD OF TAXES AND ASSESSMENT ET AL., RESPONDENTS; UNITED NEW JERSEY RAILROAD AND CANAL COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE BOARD OF TAXES AND ASSESSMENT ET AL., RESPONDENTS; CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE BOARD OF TAXES AND ASSESSMENT ET AL., RESPONDENTS; HUDSON AND MANHATTAN RAILROAD COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE BOARD OF TAXES AND ASSESSMENT ET AL., RESPONDENTS; RARITAN RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE BOARD OF TAXES AND ASSESSMENT ET AL., RESPONDENTS; LEHIGH VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY ET AL., APPELLANT, v. THE STATE BOARD OF TAXES AND ASSESSMENT ET AL., RESPONDENTS; ERIE RAILROAD COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE BOARD OF TAXES AND ASSESSMENT ET AL., RESPONDENTS

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1919-02-06

92 N.J.L. 648

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion · public domain

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgments under review in the above stated cases should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Minturn in the Supreme Court. For affirmance, — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Bergen, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, JJ. 10. For reversal — ISTone.