LAW.coLAW.co

THE BOROUGH OF MIDDLESEX, APPELLANT, v. THE INHABITANTS OF THE CITY OF PLAINFIELD, THE BOROUGH OF NORTH PLAINFIELD, AND THE BOROUGH OF DUNELLEN, AND THE STATE BOARD OF TAXES AND ASSESSMENT, RESPONDENTS; THE INHABITANTS OF THE CITY OF PLAINFIELD, THE BOROUGH OF NORTH PLAINFIELD, AND THE BOROUGH OF DUNELLEN, RESPONDENTS, v. THE STATE BOARD OF TAXES AND ASSESSMENT AND THE BOROUGH OF MIDDLESEX, APPELLANTS; THE INHABITANTS OF THE CITY OF PLAINFIELD, THE BOROUGH OF NORTH PLAINFIELD, AND THE BOROUGH OF DUNELLEN, RESPONDENTS, v. THE STATE BOARD OF TAXES AND ASSESSMENT AND THE BOROUGH OF MIDDLESEX, APPELLANTS

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1918-11-21
92 N.J.L. 520

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgments under review herein will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, HepPENHEIMER, WILLIAMS, TAYLOR, JJ. 10. For reversal — White, Gardner, JJ. 2.