LAW.coLAW.co

Philip Max, complainant-respondent, v. William M. Beckelman and Leo Steiner, defendants-appellants, John Dughi, defendant-respondent

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1934-01-05
115 N.J. Eq. 118

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered by Vice-Chancellor Stein in the court of chancery. For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 15. For reversal — None.