PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from the order of the district judge denying appellant’s See. 2255 motion, seeking to set aside his conviction and sentence. The errors claimed by the appellant, if error at all, are not such errors as would support a collateral attack on the judgment and sentence. The judgment and order appealed from are therefore
Affirmed.
. Larson v. United States, 5 Cir., 275 F.2d 673, cert. denied; 363 U.S. 849, 80 S.Ct. 1627, 4 L.Ed.2d 1732; Hill v. United States, 368 U.S. 424, 427-429, 82 S.Ct. 468, 7 L.Ed.2d 417; Alexander v. United States, 5 Cir., 290 F.2d 252, cert. denied 368 U.S. 891, 82 S.Ct. 144, 7 L. Ed.2d 89; Hodges v. United States, 108 U.S.App.D.C. 375, 282 F.2d 858.