LAW.coLAW.co

Mary Connolly, petitioner-respondent, v. Guardian Casualty Insurance Company of Buffalo, New York, defendant-appellant

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1934-01-05
115 N.J. Eq. 74

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

We affirm the opinion below for the reasons given by YiceChancellor Fallon in his opinion. We have nothing to add excepting this: We have examined the contention of the

appellant that “the counsel fee allowed to counsel for the respondent is excessive.” We think it is not. It was $250, and in the circumstances disclosed by the record was quite justified. The respondent is entitled to costs in this court. For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Peeskie, Yan Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.