LAW.coLAW.co

Lena Apfelbaum, petitioner-respondent, v. Murray Apfelbaum, defendant-appellant

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1934-04-12
115 N.J. Eq. 555

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Pee Cueiam.

Appellant seeks to be relieved from the payment of alimony under an order dated October 11th, 1933, and an order dated November 9th, 1933, amending the before-mentioned order. A careful examination of the evidence justifies the order in the sum of $40 per week in favor of the petitioner below.

We think there is no meritorious question which calls for any discussion.

The orders under review will be affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Teenchakd, Paekee, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hehee, Peeseie, Van Buseiee, Kays, Hetfield, Deae, Wells, Dill, JJ. 15. For reversal — None.