LAW.coLAW.co

JULIANA SPERR, RESPONDENT, v. JOHN BIRCH, APPELLANT

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1919-05-15
93 N.J.L. 252

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court. For affirmance■ — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, White, Heppeni-ieimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 11. For reversal — None.