LAW.coLAW.co

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. KATE MORRIS, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR

New Jersey Supreme Court1920-06-14
94 N.J.L. 567

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Gummere in the Supreme Court. For affirmance—Swayze, Trenchabd, Bergen, Kaltscit, White, Hepbeniieimeb, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, Ackbrson, JJ. 10. For reversal—Parees, J. 1.