Pee Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Gummere in the Supreme Court. For affirmance—Swayze, Trenci-iard, Bergen, IIeppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, JJ. 7.
For reversal—Parker, Kalisch, White, Taylor, JJ. 4.