LAW.coLAW.co

DANIEL STEELMAN, RESPONDENT, v. FRANK FARKAS, APPELLANT

New Jersey Supreme Court1920-03-01
94 N.J.L. 281

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons -set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chibe Justice, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisci-i, Black, White, Heppeni-ieimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, Ackerson, ,JJ. 13. For reversal—None.