LAW.coLAW.co

William F. Ballinger et al., complainants and respondents, v. John O. Wilson, appellant

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1903-03-11
65 N.J. Eq. 403

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

In the making of the decree appealed from there was no error which was prejudicial to the appellant. Upon the proofs submitted the respondents were entitled to recover from the appellant, at the very least, the $50 ordered to be paid by him. to the respondents. The decree should be affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Bogert, Yredenburgh, Yoorhees, Yroom, Green- — -14.

For reversal — None.