LAW.coLAW.co

Charles L. Duvale, complainant, v. Celine M. Duvale, defendant

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1903-11-16
65 N.J. Eq. 771

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

Decree affirmed for the reasons stated by the Vice-Chancellor.

Note. — The report of this ease in 10 Dick. Ch. Rep. 589 is an error, so far as respects the reference to 9 Dick. Ch. Rep. 581. The decree in 9 Dick. Ch. Rep. 581 was modified on appeal, as reported in 11 Dick. Ch. Rep. 375.