LAW.coLAW.co

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent, v. Sherman MACK, Petitioner

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania2003-06-05No. Appeal No. 600 WAL 2002
573 Pa. 374825 A.2d 629

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 5th day of June, 2003, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED in part, but LIMITED to the issue of whether trial counsel was ineffective by failing to file a motion to suppress the evidence found in the second search of Michelle Wilkinson’s vehicle and in failing to object to that evidence being introduced into evidence. See “Statement Pursuant to Rule 1925(b) of Appellate Procedure,” p. 3, para. 2a. The matter is REMANDED to the Superior Court for consideration and determination of this issue. In all other respects, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.