LAW.coLAW.co

THOMAS F. McCRAN, ATTORNEY-GENERAL, RESPONDENT, v. GEORGE F. WRIGHT, APPELLANT

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1921-02-15
96 N.J.L. 296

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in tlie opinion of this court just filed in tlie case of the Attorney-General v. Gaul, ante p. 165. For affii manee— Tins Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Bergen, Taylor, Gardner, Ackisrson, JJ. 7

For reversal—Bwayze, Kaliscii, Katzenbacu, White, TTeppenheimkr. Williams, JJ. 6.