MARY CHIRGOTIS, BY JOHN CHIRGOTIS, NEXT FRIEND, AND JOHN CHIRGOTIS, RESPONDENTS, v. GEORGE JAMES COUNES AND JAMES AVDOULOS, PARTNERS, TRADING AS COUNES & AVDOULOS, APPELLANTS; CONSTANTINO CHIRGOTIS, BY JOHN CHIRGOTIS, NEXT FRIEND, AND JOHN CHIRGOTIS, RESPONDENTS, v. GEORGE JAMES COUNES AND JAMES AVDOULOS, PARTNERS, TRADING AS COUNES & AVDOULOS, APPELLANTS; JOHN CHIRGOTIS, ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM OF TASSIA CHIRGOTIS, DECEASED, AND JOHN CHIRGOTIS, RESPONDENTS, v. GEORGE JAMES COUNES AND JAMES AVDOULOS, PARTNERS, TRADING AS COUNES & AVDOULOS, APPELLANTS

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1921-10-14

96 N.J.L. 542

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion · public domain

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court. For affirmance—Ti-ie Chancellor, Swayze, Trenoiiard, Parker, Minturn, Ivalisci-i, Black, Heppeni-ieimer, Williams, Gardner, Van Buskirk, JJ. 11. For reversal—None.