WEYL-ZUCKERMAN & COMPANY, A CORPORATION, RESPONDENT. v. HARRY SCHNELL ET AL., TRADING AS H. SCHNELL & COMPANY, APPELLANTS; J. C. FAMECHON & COMPANY, A CORPORATION, RESPONDENT, v. HARRY SCHNELL ET AL., TRADING AS H. SCHNELL & COMPANY, APPELLANTS

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court. For affirmance—The Chancellor, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Mjnturn, Kaltscn, Black, Herpeniieimhr, William s, Gardner, Van Bus kirk, JJ. 11. For rerenal—None.