LAW.coLAW.co

THOMAS F. McCRAN, ATTORNEY-GENERAL, RESPONDENT, v. JOHN W. SLOCUM, APPELLANT

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1921-02-15
96 N.J.L. 297

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of this court just filed in the case of the Attorney-General v. Gaul, ante p. 165. For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Bergen, Taylor, Gardner, Ackerson, JJ. 7.

For reversal—Rwayze, Kaliscii, Katzenbacu, White, TIerpenheimer, Williams, JJ. 6.