MONROE HOTEL COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. ESTATE OF RICHARD B. SOMERS, HELENA S. CONOVER ET AL., EXECUTRIX, ETC., RESPONDENTS

Per Curiam.

. The judges being equally divided on the question whether the judgment should be reversed, the judgment is affirmed, solely because of such division, which renders any opinion, by the court impossible. For affirmance — The Chancellor, Ci-iiee Justice, Swayze, Bergen, Minturn, Black, Williams, JJ. 7.

For reversal—Parker, Kalisci-i, Katzenbaci-t, White, Heppeni-leimer, Gardner, Ackerson, JJ. 7.