MARY F. SINDLE, APPELLANT, v. E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS & COMPANY, RESPONDENT

Pee CueiajU.

The judgment under review herein should, be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court. For a-ffirmance — Tira Chancellor, Chief Justice, Bergen, Heepeniieiaier, Williams, Gardner, JJ. 6. For reversal—Treno hard, Parker, Minturn, Ackeeson, Van Buskiek, JJ. 5.