LAW.coLAW.co

NATHAN FREEDMAN, RESPONDENT, v. SPICER MANUFACTURING CORPORATION, APPELLANT

New Jersey Supreme Court1922-02-02
97 N.J.L. 325

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court. For afjirmcMice — Trie Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trencbiard, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Katzenbaci-i, White, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskirk, JJ. 12. For reversal — None.