LAW.coLAW.co

CATHERINE SAFNER, APPELLANT, v. HARRY GOLLIN ET AL., RESPONDENTS

New Jersey Supreme Court1922-06-19
97 N.J.L. 576

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Katzenbach in the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chancellor, CHiee Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, White, Heppenheimbr, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Yan Buskikk, JJ. 12. For reversal — None.