LAW.coLAW.co

JOHN ZICK, RESPONDENT, v. JOHN F. SMITH, APPELLANT

New Jersey Supreme Court1922-02-02
97 N.J.L. 351

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in) the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice ICatzenbach in the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chancellor, Swayzb, Trenchaed, Parker, Minturn, Iyalisch, Black, White, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskiek, JJ. 12. For reversal — None.