LAW.coLAW.co

Ferdinand Titus, respondent, v. John McGloskey and Hattie McGloskey, appellants

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1904-12-09
67 N.J. Eq. 709

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The order appealed from in the above cause is affirmed, for the reasons given in the court of chancery. For affirmance — Dixón, Garrison, Pitney, Swayze, Reed, Bogert, Vredenburgi-i, Vroom, Green, Gray — 10. For reversal — Hone.