LAW.coLAW.co

THOMAS S. MORLEY, APPELLANT, v. GEORGE McDONALD, RESPONDENT

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1922-10-06
98 N.J.L. 275

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

. The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Swayze, Parker, Kalis oil, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenheimee, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Bus-kirk, JJ. 13. For reversal — None.