Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal with respect to respondent Currie, dismissed upon the ground that appellants have failed to demonstrate the timeliness of the motion with respect to respondent Currie as required by section 500.11 (d) (1) (iii) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11 [d] [1] [iii]); motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.
Dianna L. Clark et al., Appellants, v. City of Lockport et al., Respondents
96 N.Y.2d 932
Authorities cited
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.