Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal as against respondent Edda Dunham, denied; motion for leave to appeal otherwise dismissed upon the ground that the remainder of the Appellate Division order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
Edda Dunham, Respondent, v. Alan B. Weissman, Appellant, et al., Defendant. Toa Construction Co., Inc., et al., Third-Party Respondents
96 N.Y.2d 851
Authorities cited
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.