Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal as against Russell Associates, denied; motion for leave to appeal otherwise dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
Laur & Mack Contracting Co., Inc., Appellant, v. Dino Di Cienzo, Sr., et al., Respondents; Laur & Mack Contracting Co., Inc., Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Russell Associates, Also Known as Office of Edward D. Russell, Architect, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent
96 N.Y.2d 895
Authorities cited
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.